Legal Opinion

In Re Florance

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1956No. Crim. 5935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus by and on behalf of Charlotte F. Floranee, a fourteen year old girl detained in the Orange County Juvenile Hall at Santa Ana. Her detention is alleged to be unlawful for the reasons (1) that on January 31, 1956, she was taken into custody without legal process and questioned in an improper manner; (2) that although she has been detained ever since, the statutory procedure for detaining her has not been followed; (3) that she is not permitted to visit with ministers or other persons nor to consult with her attorney in private, and (4) that even if this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re DaedlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re DargoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Ex parte StephenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ex parte LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Pebbles v. Steven C.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. In Re Nicole B.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API