Legal Opinion

In Re Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1970No. Docket Nos. 35145-35149PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 Cal.App.3d 783 (1970)

87 Cal. Rptr. 678

In re MICHAEL DOUGLAS ROBINSON et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

LELAND C. CARTER, as Chief Probation Officer, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CONSTANCE KAUFMAN, Defendant and Appellant. (Five Cases.)

Docket Nos. 35145-35149.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 15, 1970.

COUNSEL

Roy Dankman for Defendant and Appellant.

John D. Maharg, County Counsel, Harold S. Vites and Douglas C. Miller, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

FLEMING, J.

Constance Kaufman, on behalf of herself and her five…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. In Re FloranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Carter v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In re Ella B.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions v. Robert E.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cleaver v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Department of Public Welfare v. J. K. B.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API