Legal Opinion

In Re Petersen

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1958No. Crim. 6215PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This proceeding in habeas corpus involves sections 1119 and 1156 of the Police Code of the City and County of San Francisco. Under section 1119 the chief of police may designate stands on public streets to be used by taxicabs, if the written consent of the person who occupies the ground floor of the building fronting the proposed stand is first obtained; a permit shall specify the name of the permittee and the number of vehicles authorized to use the stand at any one time, and it shall be unlawful for the owner or operator of any public passenger vehicle for hire, other than the permittee, to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API