Ex parte Stephen
California Supreme Court
Habeas Corpus to review a judgment of conviction rendered in the Superior Court of Orange County. J. W. Towner, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Petitioner, convicted in the superior court of the county of Orange, of a misdemeanor in carrying on a saloon and selling liquor without procuring a license therefor, as required by ordinance No. 35 of the board of supervisors of said county, asks to be discharged on habeas corpus, on the ground principally that the ordinance is void for various alleged reasons.
Several of the grounds of invalidity assigned may be passed over without further notice than to say that they relate to special features of the ordinance not here involved, and upon the sufficiency of which the validity of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ex parte MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ex Parte MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re MingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.