Legal Opinion
In Re Bell
California Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1942No. Crim. 4298PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRAYNOR, J. —
Petitioners, members of a labor union, while engaged in picketing certain ranches and orchards, were arrested and charged with violating sections 2 and 3 of an anti-picketing ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Yuba County in 1937. These sections read as follows : “Section 2. It is unlawful for any person to loiter, stand, or sit upon any public highway, alley, sidewalk or crosswalk so as to in any manner hinder or obstruct the free passage therein or thereon of persons or vehicles passing or attempting to pass along the same, or so as to in any manner annoy or…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.