Legal Opinion

In Re Daedler

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1924No. Crim. No. 2669PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The petitioner herein, Paul Daedler, a minor, appearing by his natural guardians, L. O. Daedler and Pauline Daedler, applies for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of securing the release of said minor from the custody of one Margaret Bullen, superintendent of the juvenile hall of Los Angeles County, who is alleged to be detaining said minor under and by virtue of an order of the juvenile court of the said county of Los Angeles, and which detention the petitioner alleges to be illegal for the reasons set forth in his petition. The facts upon which the petitioner predicates his reasons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ex parte JanuszewskiU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1911
  5. Ex parte Ah PeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Dendy v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Pee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  5. In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API