Legal Opinion
In Re Dargo
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1947No. Crim. 4118PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem.
Appeal is taken by the mother and stepfather of Fridolin J. Dargo, a minor, from the judgment and order of the juvenile court redeclaring the minor a ward of such court and returning him to the Youth Authority for further disciplinary training. The judgment and order followed specific findings by the court that the allegations contained in paragraphs I and II of the petition filed January 6, 1947, are true, and that those contained in paragraph III are not sustained and are therefore dismissed. The court further found the said minor to be 14 years of age, and that he is a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In Re DaedlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Matter of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- In Re Application of TahbelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. M.G.S.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. SilversteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- In Re SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.