Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Schmidt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1987No. C8-86-177PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Per curiam

We address two issues in this attorney discipline case. The first is whether sufficient evidence exists to justify the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law; if so, the second is whether the referee’s recommendation that the respondent, Douglas Schmidt, be temporarily suspended from the practice of law is the appropriate sanction to be imposed.

We answer both questions in the affirmative.

The Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) in a petition for disciplinary action charged respondent Douglas E. Schmidt with professional misconduct arising out of Schmidt’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API