Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pyles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1988No. C4-87-395PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

The referee appointed by the court in this lawyers disciplinary action found that respondent David A. Pyles had violated rules of professional conduct applicable to lawyers: by misappropriating client funds on three separate occasions; by making a false representation to a client; by failing to maintain adequate financial records in his law practice and falsely certifying to this court that he had; by handling a matter when he had a conflict of interest with a client; and by failing to timely file income tax returns. The referee rejected Pyles’ mitigation assertion that during the relevant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API