Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Vaught

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 31, 2005No. A04-1438PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Samuel M. Vaught, a licensed Minnesota attorney since 1981, primarily represented various pension and trust funds. This attorney discipline case arose from a July 13, 2004, petition filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility alleging that Vaught violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.4, 1.15(c), and 8.4(c) and (d) (misappropriation of client funds and false statements); 1.16(d) (failure to promptly return client files); 8.1(a)(3) (noncooperation with the disciplinary proceeding); and Rule 25 of the Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR) (failure…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PlummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API