Legal Opinion

People v. Talibdeen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2002No. S090710PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In People v. Tillman (2000) 22 Cal.4th 300, 303 [92 Cal.Rptr.2d 741, 992 P.2d 1109] (Tillman), we held that appellate courts may not correct a “discretionary sentencing choice” if the People failed to object at sentencing. Because such an error is “not correctable without considering factual issues presented by the record or remanding for additional findings,” the People have waived the issue and may not raise it for the first time on appeal. (People v. Smith (2001) 24 Cal.4th 849, 853 [102 Cal.Rptr.2d 731, 14 P.3d 942] (Smith).) In Smith, we recognized a narrow exception to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. WalzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API