People v. Talibdeen
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
In People v. Tillman (2000) 22 Cal.4th 300, 303 [92 Cal.Rptr.2d 741, 992 P.2d 1109] (Tillman), we held that appellate courts may not correct a “discretionary sentencing choice” if the People failed to object at sentencing. Because such an error is “not correctable without considering factual issues presented by the record or remanding for additional findings,” the People have waived the issue and may not raise it for the first time on appeal. (People v. Smith (2001) 24 Cal.4th 849, 853 [102 Cal.Rptr.2d 731, 14 P.3d 942] (Smith).) In Smith, we recognized a narrow exception to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. RubalcavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. SharretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. WalzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.