Legal Opinion

People v. Rubalcava

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2000No. S081209PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case we consider whether the unlawful carrying of a concealed dirk or dagger is a specific intent crime that imposes a sua sponte duty on trial courts to instruct with CALJIC No. 12.42. We conclude the offense does not have a specific intent requirement. Thus, courts have no duty to instruct the jury with CALJIC No. 12.42.

Factual and Procedural Background

On or about July 29, 1997, Officer Roland Elkins arrested defendant Ernesto Amoldo Rubalcava on an outstanding warrant. During the arrest, Officer Elkins discovered a knife on Rubalcava’s person. The knife had a blade…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. United States v. Medina-AnicacioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API