People v. Rubalcava
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
In this case we consider whether the unlawful carrying of a concealed dirk or dagger is a specific intent crime that imposes a sua sponte duty on trial courts to instruct with CALJIC No. 12.42. We conclude the offense does not have a specific intent requirement. Thus, courts have no duty to instruct the jury with CALJIC No. 12.42.
Factual and Procedural Background
On or about July 29, 1997, Officer Roland Elkins arrested defendant Ernesto Amoldo Rubalcava on an outstanding warrant. During the arrest, Officer Elkins discovered a knife on Rubalcava’s person. The knife had a blade…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Medina-AnicacioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.