People v. Walz
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
A jury convicted defendant and appellant Rondie Lamont Walz (defendant) of one count each of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)) 1 (count 1); forcible oral copulation (§ 288a, subd. (c)(2)) (count 2); sexual penetration by a foreign object (§ 289, subd. (a)(1)) (count 3); and misdemeanor battery (§§ 242, 243, subd. (a)) (count 5). The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal (§ 1118.1) on a charge of kidnapping to commit rape (§ 209, subd. (b)(1)), and the jury found the burglary allegations not true with respect to counts 1, 2,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. ZackeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. CastellanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. MorelosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Acosta, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.