Legal Opinion
People v. Ruiz
California Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 2018No. S235556PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
*1103 We granted review in this case to determine whether imposing a criminal laboratory analysis fee ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.5, subd. (a) ) and a drug program fee ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.7, subd. (a) ) is appropriate for a conviction of conspiracy to transport a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11379, subdivision (a). The Court of Appeal answered this question in the affirmative based on *1104 Penal Code section 182, subdivision (a), which provides in relevant part that persons convicted of conspiring to commit a felony "shall be punishable in the same…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- People v. Kopp, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. MiracleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Atkins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. D.B. (In re D.B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ayala v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.