Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2004No. C045469PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

In this case, we discuss some new monetary penalties and surcharges that must be imposed by trial courts in many criminal cases.

Following the denial of his motion to traverse a search warrant and suppress evidence (Pen. Code, §§ 1538.5, 1539), defendant Marco Lenel Taylor pled guilty to possessing cocaine base for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5) and admitted being armed with a nine-millimeter handgun (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (c)) and having suffered a prior conviction for possessing cocaine base for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.2, subd. (a)) in return *456for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. TalibdeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. WattsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API