People v. Smith
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
Under subdivision (b) of Penal Code section 1202.4,1 a trial court must impose “a separate and additional restitution fine” as part of the judgment of conviction entered against a criminal defendant, “unless it finds compelling and extraordinary reasons for not doing so, and states those reasons on the record.” If the “sentence includes a period of parole,” then the court must also impose a parole revocation fine “in the same amount as that imposed pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1202.4.” (§ 1202.45.)2 This second fine, however, is automatically suspended unless the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. FuhrmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. TillmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- People v. ZackeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.