Legal Opinion

People v. Birkett

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1999No. S062379PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Proposition 8 states the People of California’s “unequivocal intention” that “all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to restitution” from the convicted criminals. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (b) (article I, section 28(b)), italics added.) This measure requires restitution, absent compelling and extraordinary contrary reasons, whenever “a crime victim suffers a loss” {ibid., italics added), and it calls for implementing legislation {ibid.). The Legislature has enacted, and frequently amended, a bewildering array of responsive…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API