People v. Birkett
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Proposition 8 states the People of California’s “unequivocal intention” that “all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to restitution” from the convicted criminals. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (b) (article I, section 28(b)), italics added.) This measure requires restitution, absent compelling and extraordinary contrary reasons, whenever “a crime victim suffers a loss” {ibid., italics added), and it calls for implementing legislation {ibid.). The Legislature has enacted, and frequently amended, a bewildering array of responsive…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.