Legal Opinion

Miller v. Grossman Shoes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 9, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

In this action the trial court rendered judgment enjoining the defendants, their tenants and invitees from entering or exiting their building on Greenwich Avenue in Greenwich through the doorway on the north side of their building and crossing over the property of the plaintiffs, and also from leaving thereon personal property of any kind. Nominal damages of one dollar were also awarded to the plaintiffs. In appealing from that judgment the defendants claim they have a right to use the property in question by virtue of a public easement, an implied dedication of the land to the public, and an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  2. Bartlett v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Mihalczo v. Borough of WoodmontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Ely v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  5. Whippoorwill Crest Co. v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Drabik v. Town of East LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Christensen v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API