State v. Grant
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant was found guilty by a jury of attempted burglary in the third degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-103.1 The judgment of conviction followed his guilty plea to being a persistent serious felony offender. He appeals, claiming (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, (2) that there were several errors in the jury charge, and (3) that he was not afforded effective assistance of trial counsel. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the failure of the court to define in its jury charge the essential statutory element of an “unlawful”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. ZayasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. HuffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Muniz v. KravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. NewtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.