Legal Opinion

Mihalczo v. Borough of Woodmont

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 1, 1978PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.

The plaintiff, the owner of a shore-front cottage at Merwin’s Point in the borough of Woodmont, city of Milford, brought this action seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the use and enjoyment of her property, a determination of the rights in and to her land, and damages. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants have appealed.

The following facts were found by the court: The plaintiff’s property, known as No. 2 Chapel Street, was purchased by warranty deed in 1970, and is bounded southerly fifty feet by Long Island Sound and westerly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. City of Bridgeport v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. United States v. PachecoSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Lynch v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. A & H Corp. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Swenson v. DittnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Leydon v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API