Whippoorwill Crest Co. v. Town of Stratford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff sought an injunction, an order that the defendant release and discharge a sewer assessment lien, and other relief. The court rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plain-biff has appealed.
The plaintiff asks to have certain facts added to the finding. The additions sought would not directly affect the ultimate facts upon which the judgment depends. As no useful purpose would, therefore, be served by making these corrections, they are not made. Antenucci v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation, 142 Conn. 349, 357, 114 A.2d 216.
The court found the following facts: On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Antenucci v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Phillips v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Town of Kent v. PrattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Consumers Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by22 opinions
- A & H Corp. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lynch v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Mihalczo v. Borough of WoodmontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Meshberg v. Bridgeport City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.