Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Reed
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 5, 2008No. AC 27327PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiff, Mark J. Christensen, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding in favor of the defendants, Linda L. Reed, Scott R. Reed and S & P Ventures, LLC (S & P). The plaintiff commenced a two count action against the defendants, seeking to quiet title to a certain right-of-way and seeking a declaratory judgment of an easement by necessity over the defendants’ properties. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that he was not entitled to an easement by necessity and (2) required him to have searched the titles of all of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Myers v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Cole v. O'Tooles of Utica, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montanaro v. Aspetuck Land Trust, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Thurlow v. HultenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Thomas v. PrimusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Christensen v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Christensen v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.