Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 24, 1971PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcobx, C. J.
The plaintiff has taken what both parties treat as an appeal from the action of the defendant zoning commission in adopting a change of zone affecting the plaintiff’s land. The trial court sustained the appeal and the defendant has appealed from that judgment. We will treat the case as the parties have done. DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 152 Conn. 262, 271, 205 A.2d 774.
The plaintiff owns approximately four acres of land in the town of Old Lyme which he acquired for a nominal amount of cash in 1961. Part of the land is zoned for residential purposes and part for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.