Legal Opinion

City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1985No. A25302; CA A25375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Govt, 298 Or 574, 694 P2d 965 (1985). In our former opinion, 64 Or App 238, 668 P2d 395 (1983), we held that the issue of whether the inclusion of Area I in the Salem Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) complied with Goal 14, the urbanization goal, was moot because of the incorporation of the City of Keizer. The Supreme Court reversed that holding and remanded the case to us to decide whether the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) was correct in determining that the area is committed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halvorson v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Milne v. City of CanbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API