Legal Opinion
Milne v. City of Canby
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 1, 2004No. 2003-102; A123691PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
The City of Canby (city) amended its urban growth boundary (UGB) to include approximately 30 acres of property that was within the city limits and entirely surrounded by property in the UGB. The city also amended its comprehensive plan and zoning map to redesignate the property from Agriculture to Low Density Residential. LUBA affirmed the city’s decisions. Milne v. City of Canby, 46 Or LUBA 213 (2004). We reverse and remand.
We take the facts from LUBA’s order.
“The subject property is approximately 30 acres in size and lies entirely within the City of Canby city limits. Itis an island of land…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Thunderbird Motel, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Friends of Eugene v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Dep't of Land Conservation v. City of Klamath Falls & Badger Flats, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018