Legal Opinion

Foeller v. Housing Authority of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1953PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decree in favor of the defendants, which the circuit court entered after it had sustained a motion made by them for judgment in their favor upon the pleadings. The proceeding was instituted pursuant to the provisions of our Declaratory Judgments Act. Its main purpose was to secure a ruling as to the validity of Oregon Laws 1951, ch 373, which the parties term the Urban Redevelopment Law. The attacked decree sustained that statute as valid.

The plaintiffs (appellants) are the owners of an item of real property which is situated in a part of the city of…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API