Legal Opinion
Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. Muller
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1936PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crouch,
J. The petitioner, a public corporation organized under the Municipal Housing Authorities Law (Laws of 1934, ch. 4, comprising §§ 60 to 78, inclusive, of the State Housing Law, being Laws of 1926, ch. 823), seeks to condemn certain premises in the city of New York owned by the defendant Andrew Muller. The public use for which the premises are required is stated in the petition to be “ the clearance, replanning and reconstruction of part of an area of the City of New York, State of New York wherein there exist, and the petitioner has found to exist, unsanitary and substandard/ housing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.