In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. Goldman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
This appeal is from judgments rendered by the superior court in a special proceeding brought by the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (hereinafter called the agency), and in five separate actions which were consolidated for trial with such special proceeding. The agency began its proceeding in December 1959, pursuant to sections 33955 through 33961 of the Health and Safety Code (Stats. 1959, eh. 1542, p. 3868 et seq.), to determine (1) the validity of the redevelopment plan for the Bunker Hill Urban Renewal Project IB (hereinafter called the Bunker Hill project), (2)…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.