Legal Opinion

Warren v. MARION COUNTY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1960PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit brought under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (ORS ch 28) seeking a judgment declaring that the building code ordinance of Marion county is unconstitutional and void and that plaintiff, a building contractor, is not required to comply with its terms.

The complaint alleges that the defendant county’s insistence that plaintiff comply with the purported ordinance subjects plaintiff to irreparable loss, and that plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. The complaint then sets forth the various grounds upon which plaintiff relies in attacking the ordinance. There being no…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Askew v. Cross Key WaterwaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API