Davis v. City of Lubbock
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenhill
This direct appeal involves certain basic constitutional questions regarding the validity of the Texas Urban Renewal Law. 1 The most difficult questions before us are (1) whether the condemnation of property under the Act constitutes a taking for a “public use,” and (2) the validity of the “trial de novo” provision of the Act which, as applicable here, would require an independent trial in court on the question of whether the area to be cleared as in fact a slum as defined in the Act.
1 The general purpose of the Urban Renewal Law is to provide for the clearance of slum and blighted areas in…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- City of San Antonio v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Steele v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.