Miller v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Weaver J.
Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of Tacoma, Washington, is the owner of real property “improved and enhanced with a valuable house which is a good, sound, sanitary, modern and well-kept building.” The house is within the boundaries of the Center Street Urban Renewal Project. He initiated this action on behalf of himself, and others similarly situated, for a declaratory judgment (RCW 7.24) to challenge the constitutionality of RCW 35.81 (Laws of 1957, chapter 42, as amended by Laws of 1959, chapter 79), known as the “Urban Renewal Law,” RCW 35.81.910. Plaintiff sought injunctive…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Teter v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1980
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.