Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1963No. 35982PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver J.

Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of Tacoma, Washington, is the owner of real property “improved and enhanced with a valuable house which is a good, sound, sanitary, modern and well-kept building.” The house is within the boundaries of the Center Street Urban Renewal Project. He initiated this action on behalf of himself, and others similarly situated, for a declaratory judgment (RCW 7.24) to challenge the constitutionality of RCW 35.81 (Laws of 1957, chapter 42, as amended by Laws of 1959, chapter 79), known as the “Urban Renewal Law,” RCW 35.81.910. Plaintiff sought injunctive…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Teter v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1980

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API