Legal Opinion
State of Oregon v. Pirkey
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1955PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
On the 28th day of May, 1953, the defendant Walter Pirkey was charged by an indictment of the grand jury with the crime of drawing a bank check with insufficient funds in the bank with which to pay the check in full. The indictment specified that the defendant drew the check unlawfully and feloniously with intent to defraud. The date of the alleged crime was 9 April 1953. The indictment was drawn under and pursuant to the provisions of Oregon Laws 1949, Chapter 129, Section 1, which reads as follows:
“Any person who, for himself or as the agent or representative of another, or as an officer,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ughbanks v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- People v. CALVARESTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- People v. MarcySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- In RE OLSEN v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. EboliNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.