Goudal v. Cecil B. DeMille Pictures Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRICKE, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $34,531.23 in an action to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment entered into in April, 1925. Under this agreement respondent was employed by appellant as a motion picture actress for one year beginning May 19, 1925, with the option to appellant of four yearly extensions of the contract, each yearly extension to be at a specified substantial increase in compensation. Respondent entered upon" her duties and appellant twice exercised its option, extending the period o£ employment to May 18, 1928.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- May v. New York Motion Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- W. F. Boardman Co. v. PetchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Gregg v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Rosenberger v. Pacific Coast Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Holtzendorff v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Stoffel v. Metcalfe Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Jouflas v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- James W. Kippen v. American Automatic Typewriter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.