Legal Opinion

May v. New York Motion Picture Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1920No. Civ. No. 3032PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPinlayson, P. J.

'This is an action by a motion picture actress, employed by defendant, to recover for an alleged wrongful discharge, alleged to have occurred about twenty-one weeks before the expiration of the term of her employment.' Prom a judgment for plaintiff for $2,123.60, based on the verdict of a jury, defendant appeals.

The only controversy between the parties is whether the discharge was wrongful, and, if not, whether the damages awarded plaintiff were excessive. In the main, the questions presented by this appeal are concerned with certain instructions to the jury.

Plaintiff and defendant entered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jerome v. . Queen City Cycle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Lacy v. . GetmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Benkert v. BenkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Von Heyne v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Milligan v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Davis v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Suman v. BMW of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Bang v. International Sisal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API