Legal Opinion
Holtzendorff v. Housing Authority
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 1967No. Civ. 29865; Civ. 29866PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. *
This is an action to recover damages for the wrongful discharge of plaintiffs under their respective employment contracts with defendant. Holtzendorff was awarded $122,661 and Miss Rosien $85,538. Defendant has appealed.
Under its cross-complaint against Holtzendorff, defendant Housing Authority sought to recover money that it had paid to Holtzendorff to reimburse him for attorney fees and expenses in connection with certain criminal proceedings taken against him that grew out of his political involvement with defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of the Housing Authority for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Shoban v. Board of Trustees of Desert Center Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Williams v. Housing Authority of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.