Rosenberger v. Pacific Coast Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This cause was tried by the court and a jury, the plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appeals therefrom and from an order denying a new trial.
The plaintiff claimed that he was employed by the defendant as an accountant for the period of one year commencing November 24,1893, at a salary of eighteen hundred dollars per annum, payable in monthly installments of one hundred and fifty dollars, and that he was discharged without cause March 24, 1894. This action was commenced July 17,1894, to recover three months’ salary, from March 24 to June 24, 1893, amounting to four hundred and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Utter v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Crillo v. CurtolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.