Legal Opinion
Stoffel v. Metcalfe Construction Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1945No. 31847PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.
This action was commenced in the district court for Douglas county by Clarence M. Stoffel, as plaintiff, against the Metcalfe Construction Company, a corporation, the Hamilton Construction Company, a corporation, and the Kansas City Bridge Company, a corporation, as defendants, to recover damages for a breach of contract. From a verdict and judgment thereon in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants have appealed.
*452For the purpose of this opinion Clarence M. Stoffel will be referred to as plaintiff and the several defendant companies as defendants.
Under the principle that in a law action it is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Lacy v. . GetmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- McCulley v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Bernstein v. Lipper Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Schuessler v. Benchmark Marketing & Consulting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Styskal v. BrickeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Bill L. Ballard, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. El Dorado Tire Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Craig v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Stiles v. Skylark Meats, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.