De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
The record herein reveals that appellant entered into a contract with respondent whereby she agreed to render services as a motion picture actress in the production by respondent of two photoplays entitled “Everything is Thunder ’ ’ and ‘ ‘ The Hawk, ’ ’ each picture to be produced in London, England, to be completed within a reasonable time following the starting date, and neither to require appellant’s services for a period of more than eight weeks. For such services appellant was to receive from respondent “10% of the U. S. A. gross distribution receipts from the distribution of said two…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Roscoe Moss Co. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.