Legal Opinion

De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1940No. Civ. 11897PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

The record herein reveals that appellant entered into a contract with respondent whereby she agreed to render services as a motion picture actress in the production by respondent of two photoplays entitled “Everything is Thunder ’ ’ and ‘ ‘ The Hawk, ’ ’ each picture to be produced in London, England, to be completed within a reasonable time following the starting date, and neither to require appellant’s services for a period of more than eight weeks. For such services appellant was to receive from respondent “10% of the U. S. A. gross distribution receipts from the distribution of said two…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Roscoe Moss Co. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API