W. F. Boardman Co. v. Petch
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered upon a second trial of the case, following a reversal of the judgment entered on the first trial upon appeal to this court. (Boardman v. Fetch, 174 Cal. 259, [162 Pac. 1028].)
A statement of the facts is necessary to a clear understanding of the points to be considered. On January 28, 1911, plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract which forms the basis of the controversy. The plaintiff was then the owner of practically all the stock in a corporation known as the Bogue Eiver Valley Gas Company, having a plant situated at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Harry T. Von Eichelberger and Haig Mihram Terzian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.