Legal Opinion
United States v. Fisher
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided March 3, 1972No. 24,557PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Judge:
The United States Navy Court of Military Review affirmed the accused’s conviction of wrongful use of co'caine, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. In the course of its review, the court sustained a ruling by the trial judge admitting into evidence the accused’s answers to certain questions by an Army doctor, over defense counsel’s objection on the ground that the doctor had not first advised the accused of the right to remain silent under Article 31, Code, supra, 10 USC § 831. The evidence indicated that the accused had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. DandaneauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. BabbidgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. GorkoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. LoukasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. RaymondUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. BrisbaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.