Legal Opinion

Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1928No. Docket No. Sac. 3696PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a minor, when between eight and nine years of age. He had judgment for twenty-five thousand dollars and defendant has appealed.

On December 24, 1922, at Cottonwood, Shasta County, plaintiff was injured by coming in contact with a highly charged power line owned, maintained, and operated by defendant in serving a near-by pumping plant with electric energy. A wire of said power line had broken and fallen across the sidewalk area of a street in said town and had remained on the ground, unguarded and charged with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Denver & Rio Grande Railway v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Dullanty v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rowe v. RennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API