Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. 'The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
May 22, 1893, John 0. Grinnell, the deceased, and eight others, constituting the Prank Tucker Theatrical Company, were engaged in giving a street parade in Lansing. They had gone to North Lansing, and had returned on a street car, getting off the car a few blocks below Michigan avenue, where the . car stopped. They passed ahead of this car, four walking on one side of the car *48track, single file, about six feet apart; the others walking on the other side of the track, in the same order. Mr. Grinnell was on the east side, and near the track. Six were ahead of him, each playing a wind…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Denver & Rio Grande Railway v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Sloan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.