Legal Opinion

Dullanty v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 11573PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through collision with automobile driven by defendant. The complaint alleges negligent operation of said automobile by defendant; the answer contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. Verdict of the jury was in favor of plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.

Briefly, the following facts are fairly established by the evidence: Defendant, returning from a funeral, was traveling south at a slow rate of speed on Webster Street, near its intersection with Grand Avenue, Oakland, California. The day had been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McPherson v. WallingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Isaac Upham Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Lauder v. CurrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Vonault v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Raggio v. MalloryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Tanner v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Handley v. LombardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API