Cooper v. Huntington
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
These two eases involve substantially the same questions of law and fact and will, therefore, be treated in one opinion. The appeals are from the judgments.
The Heilman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, formerly-known as Merchants Bank & Trust Company, was the nominal owner of the properties involved in both actions, which were certain lots of “Tract 1292,” in the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles County. This corporation, which we will designate as “th,e Bank,” was in reality a trustee for the equitable owners, Huntington and Brookins.
The Condon Case. Under date of March 25, 1912, the Bank…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Smith v. Phœnix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tracy v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Conlin v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Owen v. Pomona Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reiniger v. HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Scroggin v. WorthyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Curtis v. Title Guarantee and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Kalkruth v. Resort Properties, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.