Legal Opinion

Tracy v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1917No. L. A. No. 3983PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Humphrey Marshall, and Frederick A. Preston, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.

Action to rescind a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to buy from defendants for a stipulated sum a five acre tract of land, planted to one year old citrus trees, and to recover the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars paid defendants in the purchase price thereof, upon the ground that plaintiff was induced to make the contract and payment of purchase money thereon through and by means of false and fraudulent representations made by defendants as vendors of the same. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff defendants appeal.

It appears without controversy that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Strand v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Winkler v. JerrueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Muller v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. The Atkins Corporation v. TournyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API