Legal Opinion

Onumonu v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1990No. 505-89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by a jury of theft of an aggregate amount over $750 and under $20,000. The jury assessed punishment at eight (8) years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $5,000 fine. The Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished opinion. Onumonu v. State, No. 11-86-212-CR (Tex.App.—Eastland, delivered June 25,1987). We remanded the case for a harmless error analysis, under Tex.R.App.Pro. 81(b)(2), in light of Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). The Court of Appeals again affirmed, concluding beyond a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Ex Parte LunaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Onumonu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soto v. Sea-Road International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Harding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Reynoso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API