Harding v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
This is a “Rose harm” case. See Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1987-1988), and Arnold et al. v. State, 786 S.W.2d 295, 315 (Tex.Cr.App.1990). The offense is aggravated robbery; enhanced by a prior conviction, the punishment is sixty years confinement. Harding v. State, 1989 WL 6965 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] No. 01-86-00686-CR, delivered February 2, 1989).
I
The indictment alleged and the proof showed that on a June afternoon in 1985 appellant entered a place of business, confronted a secretary/receptionist,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Onumonu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newsome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Fonseca v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.