Legal Opinion

Harding v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1990No. 378-89PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

This is a “Rose harm” case. See Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1987-1988), and Arnold et al. v. State, 786 S.W.2d 295, 315 (Tex.Cr.App.1990). The offense is aggravated robbery; enhanced by a prior conviction, the punishment is sixty years confinement. Harding v. State, 1989 WL 6965 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] No. 01-86-00686-CR, delivered February 2, 1989).

I

The indictment alleged and the proof showed that on a June afternoon in 1985 appellant entered a place of business, confronted a secretary/receptionist,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Onumonu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newsome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. Fonseca v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API