Rose v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
In this cause we decide whether an instruction on the law of parole in the charge of the court to the jury given pursuant to the mandate in Article 37.07, § 4(a), V.A.C. C.P., is constitutional. The Dallas Court of Appeals sitting En Banc held the instruction is not violative of the separation of powers doctrine of Article II, § 1 in the Texas Bill of Rights or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Due Course Clauses of Article I, §§ 13 and 19 in our Bill of Rights. Rose v. State, 724 S.W.2d 832…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. OlsenTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Presnell v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by597 opinions
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
592 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.