Soto v. Sea-Road International, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Justice.
Luciano S. Soto, defendant below, appeals from an adverse judgment in a suit brought by Sea-Road International, Inc (“Sea-Road”). Sea-Road, a transportation service company, sued Soto for conversion resulting from a breach of implied contract for bailment. Following a bench trial, the court rendered judgment for Sea-Road and ordered that it recover $85,000 in damages with prejudgment interest and costs. By seven points of error, Soto challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
This…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sherman v. First National Bank in CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Clute v. City of Lake JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Joseph, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Varel Manufacturing Co. v. Acetylene Oxygen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- International Freight Forwarding, Inc. v. American Flange, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1998
- Smith v. Radam, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Crompton Greaves, Ltd. v. Shippers Stevedoring Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.