Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at a fine of $20,000.00 and confinement for twenty (20) years in the Texas Department of Corrections. 1 The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Johnson v. State, 737 S.W.2d 923 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1987). This Court granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review and remanded the case in light of Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). Johnson v. State, No. 1213-87 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). On remand the Court of Appeals found that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ex Parte KlasingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.